Back to Board Index
Back to Board Index
Forum help
| Boeing 737 QNH update (Question?) | |
Richard Coton   3rd May 2014 10:11:08 | Hello All,
On this page of the website, you make it clear that only one line of code in one file has been modified to correct this obvious mistake, however I am someone who likes to modify the default planes quite a lot, and this being in a .cab file is a real pain, I've tried extracting it into a folder and trying to merge the bits I want to, but it always seems to overwrite the fix. I was wondering if its possible to paste the modified line here and exactly what file its located in, then I could try adding all the fixes I want to, rather than picking and choosing, thanks. |
Tim Walters  11th May 2014 16:14:42 | The question in simpler terms: what line(s) of code needs to be edited. |
| Richard Coton 29th Jun 2014 13:08:37 | Bump. |
| Richard Coton 1st Aug 2014 20:28:41 | Is it really that hard to find one line of code that it takes 3 MONTHS plus to answer this thread? |
Joe Clifford   5th Aug 2014 21:37:36 | Richard,
"Is it really that hard to find one line of code that it takes 3 MONTHS plus to answer this thread?" - Please don't take offence, Richard, however, you're opening yourself up with this statement as to why you didn't/couldn't find it yourself. Non the less, I decided to have a look for you. I found that within pfd.xml, there is an element titled - "Baro Readout" I would imagine that the string that needs replacing is: <GaugeString>%((A:Kohlsman setting hg,inHg))%!6.2f! IN.</GaugeString> It needs changing to: <GaugeString>%((A:Kohlsman setting hg,mbar))%!d! MB.</GaugeString> There may be more lines that need changing, I'm not sure, but that's my guess. Regards, Joe |
| Richard Coton 8th Aug 2014 01:30:56 | Hello Joe,
On closer analysis of the aforementioned file. It does appear as this is the 'single line' referred to by the download. I have tried playing around with many files since I originally posted this and I did coincidentally find that very line by luck. Thanks for your reply and although I found the answer to this question, I still find it frustrating that after 3 months of being live, this thread remained unanswered. One would've thought someone would've had a record of changes and would therefore not need to self-investigate. As stated above. I did find this line and change it accordingly. But I am disappointed that this thread was not answered/(ignored?) by fsopen staff despite being their own fix. Thanks anyway. |
You need to Log on to post a reply. |
Forum help